Talk:009A
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Which looks better? Or does it not matter to you?
- Leave it the way it is now, I think it looks better. Nicely highlighted... --Aschratt 17:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- The current one is good. I wish the wiki engine also highlights the syntax similar to Sanny Builder :) Seemann 20:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, good idea! There are several syntax highlighting extensions for MediaWiki, just need to add the custom language. Could even use it for highlighting snippets from map and config files... --Steve-m 22:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Syntax highlighting extension added, supports scm syntax, see Help:Syntax Highlighting --Steve-m 22:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- How do I link within the code? -Spaceeinstein 05:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't seem to be possible, but there might be a way to auto-link opcodes from within the parser. We're still fine-tuning the language file anyway. --Steve-m 15:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- How do I link within the code? -Spaceeinstein 05:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Syntax highlighting extension added, supports scm syntax, see Help:Syntax Highlighting --Steve-m 22:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, good idea! There are several syntax highlighting extensions for MediaWiki, just need to add the custom language. Could even use it for highlighting snippets from map and config files... --Steve-m 22:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
INI line
spaceeinstein, I propose to write Sanny Builder's ini line first, and unified DB line write as sometimes as first variant is way more popular. Seemann 19:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
